Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+re\;\s+Ladder\s+Line\s+Fed\s+Dipole\s+Isssue\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+re\;\s+Ladder\s+Line\s+Fed\s+Dipole\s+Isssue\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] re; Ladder Line Fed Dipole Isssue (score: 1): Author: "JOHN POWELL" <john.powell@kinect.co.nz>; Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 11:34:16 +1300; Is your dipole length, i.e. 110 feet, too short for 80 metres. A quick calculation by me covering 3.5mhz and 3.9 mhz shows lengths of 133 feet and 120 feet respectively. Just a thought, maybe lengthe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-10/msg00184.html (6,710 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] re; Ladder Line Fed Dipole Isssue (score: 1): Author: Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 19:58:44 +0000; Tweaking feedline length does absolutely nothing to affect the SWR on the line. What it does is merely to allow the tuner to see a more favourable load impedance. SWR in the transmission line is a fu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-10/msg00187.html (8,919 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] re; Ladder Line Fed Dipole Isssue (score: 1): Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 16:46:25 -0400; Don: I'm aware of that. I just needed to address the limited range of my auto-tuner and trimming the feed line allowed a more favorable impedance. Worked out well. Thanks, Tony ______________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-10/msg00188.html (7,612 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]