Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+radials\s+for\s+shunt\s+fed\s+tower\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] radials for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: "Howard Klein" <howk2@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 14:20:58 +0000
I have been using my shunt fed tower for 160 with satsisfactory results. I have between 20 and 30 radials of about 130 ft. I recently added a second and separate shunt feed for 80 meters and plan to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00080.html (7,040 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] radials for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 09:16:40 -0600
Several references, including the ARRL Antenna Handbooks, advise using more radials rather than longer radials, at least until reaching about 50 in number. 73 de WO&Oslash;W Howard Klein wrote: I hav
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00081.html (8,707 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] radials for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 10:47:35 EST
Howard, If you're going to add some set number of additional radials, without question, adding more 130' radials would be more beneficial than adding 65' radials. For a fixed number of radials, longe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00082.html (7,664 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] radials for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: w7kxb@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 17:18:04 +0000
James: Any chance K3LC's article is available at a web site for downloading? Carry on BillH _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers"
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00083.html (9,613 bytes)

5. RE: [TowerTalk] radials for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: "Les Kalmus" <w2lk@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 12:23:57 -0500
Google it. It's on the web. 73, Les James: Any chance K3LC's article is available at a web site for downloading? Carry on BillH 65' wire, there or cutting an Weather questions _______________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00084.html (10,353 bytes)

6. RE: [TowerTalk] radials for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: w7kxb@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 17:57:09 +0000
Thanks for the Heads Up. Found it at:http://www.ncjweb.com/k3lcmaxgainradials.pdf Carry on BillH _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting To
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00085.html (7,651 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] radials for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 14:32:20 -0500
satsisfactory results. I added a second additional radials. to ~65 ft or ~130 Every actual measurement I've seen has indicated when more than a few radials are used adding short radials between long
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00087.html (8,966 bytes)

8. RE: [TowerTalk] radials for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Bullon" <kc5ajx@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 21:32:12 +0000
--Original Message Follows-- From: w7kxb@comcast.net To: <w2lk@earthlink.net>, <Jamesnf@aol.com>, <rf@xemaps.com>,<towertalk@contesting.com> CC: Les Kalmus <w2lk@earthlink.net> Subject: RE: [TowerTal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00091.html (9,039 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] radials for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 16:03:00 -0800
The short answer to your first question: "how do I tell.." is that you can't, at least not easily. So you're left with some systems engineering kinds of questions. 1) You could measure your antennas
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00097.html (12,360 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] radials for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 06:01:42 -0500
the radial system time and work of Anything more than 50-60 1/4 wl radials is largely a waste of time and money. 100 radials give an insignificant improvement only when they are pretty long. over a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00106.html (10,102 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] radials for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 23:59:13 -0500
I'd just pull in 40-60 1/4 wl radials maximum or as many as I could as long as I could and call it a night. All this planning and worry over something that can't be easily and accurately modeled, mea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00149.html (9,854 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] radials for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:34:34 EST
Mass won't help for RF. You're looking to enhance conductivity over the ground surface area surrounding the tower, normally done with radial systems. Jim W9TM ________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00151.html (8,174 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] radials for shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 06:12:33 -0500
mass may You need electrical mass Doc (low impedance) or electrical inertia, not physical mass. The job of a radial is to spread the voltage and current around. By definition that must include elect
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00157.html (9,859 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu