Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+multiple\s+antennas\s+on\s+same\s+tower\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] multiple antennas on same tower (score: 1)
Author: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:40:58 -0200
Hello Thinking on fixed antennas to avoid rotor problems, I have a question/doubt. if I have a stack of 3 antennas (15 mts monobanders) on the same tower, how worst will be to add a second stack of 3
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-02/msg00237.html (7,086 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] multiple antennas on same tower (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:20:18 -0600
Big problems with that, Jorge. Even if 90 degrees off and I think you won't be positioning them that far off (more like 70 degrees or so?) with only 6 feet of separation (your example used two feet b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-02/msg00239.html (8,921 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] multiple antennas on same tower (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:59:56 -0600
Jorge, I took a six element 15 design I had and put three of them with 50 foot spacing in EZNEC Pro. In free space the SWR was as follows, driving all three: 21.000. 1.035 21.225. 1.028 21.450. 1.290
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-02/msg00240.html (10,287 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] multiple antennas on same tower (score: 1)
Author: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:12:12 -0200
Hi Stan Or maybe a better idea is to have two 200 ft tower, one for Europe and other for USA each one with 3 x 10 mts + 3 x 15 mts + 3 x 20 mts beam at the appropriate height? 73, Jorge De: Stan Stoc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-02/msg00241.html (10,225 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] multiple antennas on same tower (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:01:52 -0600
Jorge, One of the benefits of a stack is to reduce or eliminate the higher angle lobes for receive. From the middle of the USA where I am located, it can make a big difference in reducing the QRM fro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-02/msg00243.html (13,198 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] multiple antennas on same tower (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:22:04 -0500
Quick switching and the ability to run in two different directions is nice at times but as Stan said it is a lot of work. My preference when operating from South America was to run Europe when it was
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-02/msg00246.html (9,111 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] multiple antennas on same tower (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:01:56 -0700
Big problems with that, Jorge. Even if 90 degrees off and I think you won't be positioning them that far off (more like 70 degrees or so?) with only 6 feet of separation (your example used two feet b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-02/msg00248.html (8,388 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] multiple antennas on same tower (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:50:15 -0600
All I am saying is that 18 Yagi antennas and the associated switching to cover 20/15/10 in two fixed directions is a lot of work. Jorge, two towers with arrays pointing different directions is a goo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-02/msg00258.html (9,818 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu