- 1. [TowerTalk] hy-gain LJ-203ba info (score: 1)
- Author: "k2vi" <k2vi@cox.net>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:33:34 -0500
- Hello to all, I cannot seem to find much feedback on the 203ba. It seems to be a very unpopular antenna.The specs are there on the hy-gain page but a little ambiguous, The max wind rating is 80MPH. W
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00679.html (7,288 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] hy-gain LJ-203ba info (score: 1)
- Author: n8de@thepoint.net
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:22:24 -0500
- A few clicks of the mouse give: http://www.hy-gain.com/man/pdf/LJ-203BA.pdf Don N8DE _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00684.html (8,328 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] hy-gain LJ-203ba info (score: 1)
- Author: "Tim Duffy K3LR" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:26:41 -0600
- Hello Tony! Back in the 70s and 80s I used two 203Bas. They worked great. Simple and straight forward. No problems. 73! Tim K3LR Hello to all, I cannot seem to find much feedback on the 203ba. It see
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00686.html (8,598 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] hy-gain LJ-203ba info (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Goins <wmgoins@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:24:08 -0600
- I too have used the 203BA and it worked fine. Michael Goinsm k5wmg Professor, Writing University of Texas at San Antonio Please do not print this e-mail unless it is completely necessary ____________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00700.html (9,680 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] hy-gain LJ-203ba info (score: 1)
- Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 00:23:02 -0700
- I had a 204ba which we converted to a 203 on a longer boom. Haven't used it in years. I think the 203 on the longer boom was supposed to have a better pattern. I am sure there is modeling of it out o
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00707.html (9,532 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu