Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+folded\s+radials\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+folded\s+radials\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] folded radials (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:45:58 EDT; I was not sure how folded radials would work in my small backyard while installing my radial system for my W9AD vertical multiband phase system. On antenna one, I had 20 radials working well that wer; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00433.html (8,216 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] folded radials (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 02:59:53 +0000; N0AH described his radials, ending with: Paul, every time I see you drive by, I honk & wave, but you don't seem to notice. I have seen at least a half dozen different cars around here with an "NOAH"; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00461.html (7,994 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] folded radials (score: 1): Author: "Dennis O'Connor" <k8do@mailblocks.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:08:22 -0400; Brett, An old AM broadcast engineer I know is also a ham and I have chatted with him on 80 meters... He uses a 1/4 wl. vertical antenna... He has a 4 foot square (4' x 4'), 10 ga., copper plate with; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00465.html (7,506 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] folded radials (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:10:52 +0000; K8DO added on query about merit of longer radials on (or in ground) folded back when in a tight space: I would imagine that chap had good soil conductivity, especially some distance away. First two m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00480.html (9,000 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] folded radials (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 05:53:31 -0400; have chatted with He has a 4 foot the base insulator out just fine and return currents get down... He has the plate increased that he no cannot put out radials return for etc., is not as more - and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00484.html (9,294 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] folded radials (score: 1): Author: "Dennis O'Connor" <k8do@mailblocks.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:49:05 -0400; You can hear all kinds of things presented as fact, even when they aren't. ** quote: "I mention this as an item of interest for those who cannot put out radials that perhaps the cost of a copper plat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00487.html (7,762 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] folded radials (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:24:22 -0400; appropriate radial field... The theory was tossed out that the plate "collected ground currents well" or something to that effect. Plate, screen, SUV, truck, camper, or just a handful of wires it is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00488.html (8,654 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] folded radials (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:35:13 -0700; I tend to agree with Tom here, although, the plate is a LOT closer to the ground than Tom's truck (unless it's one of those nifty dual use planter/antenna base types without wheels<grin>) Just ballpa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00503.html (9,225 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] folded radials (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:22:09 -0400; Reactance doesn't matter.... away... call it 1.5 ohms reactance 4MHz, about 120 the ground that truck. since it isn't dissipative and simply causes the antenna to "shift frequency". The resistance is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00517.html (8,861 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] folded radials (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:42:09 -0700; True.. but if you had a very huge series reactance to ground, then not much current is going to flow through that path, so the actual loss (for that part) will be low. Of course, it may well be that; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00536.html (9,719 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] folded radials (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:44:10 -0400; car body) and a ground and the ground coupled much more That's why the closer a small counterpoise is to earth, the greater the losses are. The worse case would be when it is connected to the lossy; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00537.html (8,988 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] folded radials (score: 1): Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:38:55 +0000; -- No comments on all the replies and postings on this subject. However, my big hard drive just smoked yesterday, and in restoring it, I found a program which I used to use when mobile which gives a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00554.html (8,583 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]