Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+deep\s+base\s+for\s+MA\-550\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+deep\s+base\s+for\s+MA\-550\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1): Author: "David Giuliani" <David@Giuliani.org>; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 11:47:24 -0700; I'm installing a concrete base for a Universal Towers MA-550. The mfg's dwg calls for a base 2.5' x 2.5' x 5' deep in undisturbed soil, using 2.5 cubic yards. I passed this by my soils engineer, who'; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00064.html (7,448 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu; Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 15:18:01 -0700; I calculate under 1.25 cubic yards for that hole. You're going to have a LOT of concrete left over. 3' x 3' x 6' is two yards. 73, _______________________________________________ See: http://www.msco; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00069.html (7,235 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1): Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>; Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 19:19:50 -0500; Hold on here. Isn't the formula pi*r^2*h=v? My calc says about 78.5 cu ft or 2.9 cu yds. Oh, I'm sorry. I just noticed the @stanford.edu. At 05:18 PM 10/4/03, gdaught6@stanford.edu wrote: On 4 Oct 20; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00070.html (9,000 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 20:40:10 -0400; There are 27 cu ft in 1 cu yd (3 ft x 3 ft x 3 ft)...so 2.5 ft x 2.5 ft x 5.0 ft = 31.25 cu ft... divided by 27 cu ft = 1.157 cu yd. Jerry K3BZ -- Original Message -- From: Jim Rhodes To: gdaught6@st; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00071.html (9,743 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1): Author: EL34GUY@aol.com; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 20:57:04 EDT; This is how I calculated it too, 4.5x4.5x7.5/27 = 5.625 yards plus about another yard for belling it out was 6.5 yards. Mark W0NCL _______________________________________________ See: http://www.msco; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00073.html (8,018 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 20:01:43 -0500; I can't do that fancy math. But as a retired mason contractor...I can use a concrete calculating slide rule. (The redimix outfits used to hand them out free and you may ask your supplier, they may gi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00074.html (11,994 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 21:21:45 -0400; You may be right for a cylinder....but he said 2.5 x 2.5 x 5.... that's not a cylinder. Still, the calcs (1.157 vs 1.25) are not that much different. :-) Jerry K3BZ -- Original Message -- From: FireB; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00078.html (12,403 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 20:34:57 -0500; Maybe I misread something or confused it with another email. Didn't he say that he was told to get a auger and auger in a hole? That would make it a cylinder.??? But he did say 2.5 x 2.5 was the manu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00079.html (13,268 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1): Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>; Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 20:37:44 -0500; No, the hole his engineer recommended was 2 ft in diameter & 25 ft deep. "I passed this by my soils engineer, who's recommending a different design -- drill a 2' hole with an augur, 25' deep." At 08:; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00080.html (14,030 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 21:38:25 -0400; Yeah, well... no worries...maybe this thread has just about exhausted itself anyway :-) Jerry K3BZ -- Original Message -- From: FireBrick To: Jerry Keller ; gdaught6@stanford.edu ; towertalk@contesti; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00081.html (13,980 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1): Author: "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 22:44:49 -0400; NOT A CYLINDER - NO DIAMETERS ARE INVOLVED HERE! IT IS A SQUARe CORNERED HOLE!!!!! Like K3BZ said... (or simply a cubic yard is - you guessed it a yard by a yard by a yard - AKA 3 ft X 3 ft X 3 ft --; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00082.html (13,970 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1): Author: "Mike Warnock" <k7xn@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 16:52:24 -0700; As a commercial construction superintendent with 25+ years in the field I seldom have found the civil engineer to override the structural engineer's specifications. Civil engineers although very educ; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00119.html (10,899 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]