Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+connector\s+losses\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+connector\s+losses\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Connector losses (score: 1): Author: w4byg@qsl.net (Ray LaRue); Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 07:45:17 -0500; Most of the previous comments about so called SWR "bumps" caused by UHF connectors at HF frequencies, should be ignored. I have tested numerous combinations on an HP 8753C network analyzer. They are; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00331.html (7,086 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Connector losses (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 10:38:35 -0500; ....unless you are making impedance critical measurements and have a bunch of connectors in line. The very real bumps caused by the lower than 50 ohm impedance of the SO-239 are certainly not a prob; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00340.html (7,524 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] connector losses (score: 1): Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:53:33 -0500; I have to agree, a connector that has any measurable loss will get warm. I was told by one of our RF engineers many years ago that at UHF and 900 MHz we should expect as much as .1 dB loss for each c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00031.html (10,163 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]