Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+best\s+medium\s+sized\s+tribander\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+best\s+medium\s+sized\s+tribander\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] best medium sized tribander... (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 17:40:02 -0500; Keith wrote the following: All SteppIR owners love their antennas. May have something to do with justification of price paid. Comparing the 3-el to the T6 is not realistic. 73 Keith NM5G -0- First, K; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00727.html (8,322 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] best medium sized tribander... (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:57:57 -0800; Excellent points, Jim. No doubt the SteppIR is a very desirable antenna. For the life of me I cannot understand why there are so many SteppIR owners that get downright defensive when someone says som; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00729.html (11,044 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] best medium sized tribander... (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 22:40:27 -0500; It is true that the tuneable steppIR requires time for band change. And that has value in a competitive contest situation. As a sole antenna, that will requires a tactical change. It is true that fai; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00751.html (7,987 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]