Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+antenna\s+heights\s+and\s+the\s+FAA\/FCC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+antenna\s+heights\s+and\s+the\s+FAA\/FCC\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] antenna heights and the FAA/FCC (score: 1): Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 20:00:19 -0700; Im moving to Texas and have found a house that suits most of our needs with one exception the same one that KEEPS ruling out property unfortunately in this rules and regulation age... anyway the hous; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00122.html (8,579 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna heights and the FAA/FCC (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 22:05:37 -0500; A phone call to the FAA will usually net you an informal answer right away. I've gone through this with proposed lighting for a football field overlooking an airport and the formal letter only took a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00123.html (9,634 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna heights and the FAA/FCC (score: 1): Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 20:07:05 -0700; Super - I'll try that - thanks! g. A phone call to the FAA will usually net you an informal answer right away. I've gone through this with proposed lighting for a football field overlooking an airpor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00124.html (9,582 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna heights and the FAA/FCC (score: 1): Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 02:10:42 -0500; I'm not sure why you are measuring in meters as the FAA does almost everything in nautical miles and some in statute miles. At-any-rate, 4.554 lm = 2.83 statute miles so it'll likely depend on whethe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00131.html (10,604 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna heights and the FAA/FCC (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 08:35:58 -0800; Gee -- I certainly hope that a Rule or Regulation based entirely on enhancing the safety of aviation is not considered excessive! A suggestion. If you haven't already done so, it would be worth runn; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00137.html (8,400 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]