Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+aluminum\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+aluminum\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] aluminum (score: 1): Author: rharris7@pacbell.net (WIN95 USER); Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 13:33:46 -0800; I did not mean to get protracted controversy going here, sorry. I have had thirty years of experience with Heights towers and am perfectly happy with them, I am just looking for another one. Thanks f; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00123.html (6,992 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] aluminum (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL@aol.com); Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 20:34:54 EST; Hello Bob! I agree on your feelings on Alum towers. I have had my 50 foot Universal up for some 15 years and it looks as good as the day it went up and works great. Have 12 sq feet up there and the t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00134.html (7,396 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] aluminum (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 09:59:29 -0800; Guess what material the HDBX uses for rivits. Yep. Aluminum . . . I will guarentee that contributes significantly to its puny ratings. Stan w7ni@teleport.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00271.html (7,229 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]