Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ZR3\s+vs\.\s+Attic\s+Dipole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ZR3\s+vs\.\s+Attic\s+Dipole\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] ZR3 vs. Attic Dipole (score: 1): Author: ValErwin@aol.com (ValErwin@aol.com); Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 14:19:04 EST; Howdy! Before I would lay down my hard earned cash, for a ZR3, (dipole design) that essentially lays on the ground, I would seriously look at an attic dipole. It is real easy to poke a hole in the sh; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00531.html (7,710 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] ZR3 vs. Attic Dipole (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 14:29:35 -0600; Counterpoints if you please. I have tried every kind of attic antenna there is: dipoles, folded dipoles, G5RV, 8JK's, J-poles, Isotrons, aluminum tape on the windows, ad infinitum, and at one locatio; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00532.html (10,591 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] ZR3 vs. Attic Dipole (score: 1): Author: ValErwin@aol.com (ValErwin@aol.com); Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 18:45:38 EST; John: Your point of RFI is well taken! Back in the era when I was putting antennas in attics, there was not this proliferation of CPU based products. I agree with your 3 dB down comment on attic moun; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00535.html (7,375 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]