Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+YOed\s+older\s+4\s+el\s+20\s+meter\s+CC\s+Skywalkers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+YOed\s+older\s+4\s+el\s+20\s+meter\s+CC\s+Skywalkers\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] YOed older 4 el 20 meter CC Skywalkers (score: 1): Author: "NABEREZNY JOHN" <John_WE2F@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 05:55:51 -0400; Hi Folks, I presently have three 4 element 20 meter Skywalkers assembled and waiting to go up and I was wondering if anyone has optimized these antennas? They will be stacked 32/62/102. Thanks 73/ Jo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00174.html (6,844 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] YOed older 4 el 20 meter CC Skywalkers (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 07:58:08 -0400; I presently have three 4 element 20 meter Skywalkers assembled and waiting to go up and I was wondering if anyone has optimized these antennas? They will be stacked 32/62/102. John, I would be suspec; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00179.html (7,995 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] YOed older 4 el 20 meter CC Skywalkers (score: 1): Author: Trentkd5ia@aol.com; Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 18:46:20 EDT; I'm confused. When I model my future tower using YT, the best performance (pattern and gain) occurs with a spacing of 0.5 wavelength. This spacing outperforms 0.6, 0.9 and 1.0 wave spacings on my fla; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00196.html (7,467 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] YOed older 4 el 20 meter CC Skywalkers (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 07:28:08 -0400; At 06:46 PM 5/10/04, Trentkd5ia@aol.com wrote: I'm confused. When I model my future tower using YT, the best performance (pattern and gain) occurs with a spacing of 0.5 wavelength. This spacing outpe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00201.html (9,868 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] YOed older 4 el 20 meter CC Skywalkers (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 09:28:33 -0400; antenna That's right. It's all a matter of pattern multiplication. To have significant gain increase in one direction or angle, you have to remove significant energy from another direction. We used; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00210.html (10,724 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]