Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+XM240\s+to\s+Moxon\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+XM240\s+to\s+Moxon\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1): Author: Jerry <grf@uneedspeed.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:26:22 -0700; I just read an article on the W6NL conversion of a XM240 to a 40M Moxon. Anyone else ever tried this and do you have any comments, if so? Tnx & 73 Jerry France K7LY Lake Havasu City, AZ _____________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00500.html (6,430 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1): Author: "Tim Duffy K3LR" <k3lr@k3lr.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:00:05 -0500; Hi Jerry, Here are two mechanical designs for the 40 meter W6NL Moxon. Standard and heavy duty. The performance of the W6NL Moxon is very good. Good gain, good F/B and low VSWR across the entire band; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00501.html (9,184 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1): Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:52:13 -0400; If I remember correctly, K3LR has converted all of his to moxons. Check his web site as I think the specs and details are on his site. 73 Chet N4fX I just read an article on the W6NL conversion of a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00502.html (8,007 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:35:11 -0700; Hi Jerry, Here are two mechanical designs for the 40 meter W6NL Moxon. Standard and heavy duty. The performance of the W6NL Moxon is very good. Good gain, good F/B and low VSWR across the entire band; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00512.html (9,285 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1): Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:03:13 +0200; Yes, I have a three stack of 5L KLM yagis. The lower two are hard wired phased and fixed direction U.S. If I add the highest yagi to the stack I almost always get 10db higher differences reported fro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00513.html (8,039 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 05:48:35 -0700; Hi Jerry, Here are two mechanical designs for the 40 meter W6NL Moxon. Standard and heavy duty. A pair of two element W6NL Moxon's weighs about 100 lbs and the pair of four element Yagi's weigh a lit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00514.html (7,733 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1): Author: "Stan Stockton" <k5go@cycle-24.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:01:47 -0500; Peter, I would expect that if you have three 20M Yagis stacked for 20M that they are spaced something like a wavelength apart and the difference is in the angle that is covered by that high one which; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00515.html (10,245 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1): Author: "Stan Stockton" <k5go@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:07:35 -0500; Peter, I would expect that if you have three 20M Yagis stacked for 20M that they are spaced something like a wavelength apart and the difference is in the angle that is covered by that high one which; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00516.html (10,202 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1): Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:27:02 +0200; Hi Dan, Yes, it´s all dependend on the skip angle and the nulls. The addition of the highest antenna resembles an amp at the very low angles only. I use 13m spacing and EZNEC predicts the following o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00517.html (10,840 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1): Author: Clay W7CE <w7ce@curtiss.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:37:40 -0700; When comparing antennas, you can't just look at the maximum gain, you also have to consider take-off angle. When you add the highest yagi to the lower stack of two yagi, you will have a lower take-of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00518.html (11,206 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1): Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:49:04 +0200; Hi Clay, Exactly! My answer to Dan overlapped with yours 73 Peter When comparing antennas, you can't just look at the maximum gain, you also have to consider take-off angle. When you add the highest; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00519.html (11,547 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:12:23 -0400; I don't think EZNEC tells you the whole story, in this case - I would expect that high yagi to give you much better signals into the West Coast by virtue of the lower angle of radiation. This problem; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00524.html (10,335 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1): Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:25:51 -0400; An interesting experiment I've been performing is comparing the difference between a 20M rotating dipole at 150' and a stack of 204BAS at 110'/64'. The dipole is usually an S-unit less, and does not; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00525.html (8,520 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]