Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+XM\-240\s+Failure\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+XM\-240\s+Failure\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] XM-240 Failure (score: 1): Author: "D. Drake" <daleaa1qd@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:28:38 -0500; Some of you may know I recently moved to a new QTH in New Durham, NH where I have installed a 70 ft. Rohn tower. On the tower is my old 4 el SteppIR and a new XM-240. The XM-240 is up at about 85 ft.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-12/msg00092.html (9,277 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] XM-240 Failure (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:11:44 -0500; I had a similar failure on a Force12 EF240X. Force uses rivets. Eventually it elongated the holes on the boom and broke the rivets and the element fell 117 feet. I fixed the element and then the foll; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-12/msg00093.html (10,584 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] XM-240 Failure (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:02:59 -0500; The EF240X was up about 8 years (a couple of hurricanes, a few Nor'easters, didn't survive the tornado). I never had trouble with the C3 I had. The EF240X elements are a bit bigger than the C3 and ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-12/msg00095.html (13,086 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] XM-240 Failure (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:53:50 -0600; I have had considerable experience with both antennas (EF240X and XM240X) and the C3 for that matter. I originally had the C3 and EF240X up at about 35 M and just couldn't keep the 40 meter antenna u; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-12/msg00096.html (14,721 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]