- 1. [TowerTalk] Wire mesh (score: 1)
- Author: k7lxc@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:09:23 EST
- Howdy, TowerTalkians -- Regarding using mesh for a rebar cage, it has several problems. First, it's not in any tower base spec I've ever seen. Second, how would you stiffen it up to have it stand up?
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00392.html (7,061 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Wire mesh (score: 1)
- Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:12:59 +0000
- Actually it is in my old rohn catalog also. With caveat that it have the same steel cross section area as the specified rebar. I can see where it might be a nice substitute for the large top and bott
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00395.html (8,831 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Wire mesh (score: 1)
- Author: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:20:08 -0600
- Steve, Please take look at the Rohn catalog spec for the HDBX-48 (BX towers in general). I believe Rohn says mesh is okay. I'm trying to follow the prime directive. 73, Joe kk0sd Howdy, TowerTalkians
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00398.html (8,761 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Wire mesh (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:23:26 -0500
- Good one Steve! I like that one... - M --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Gary "Joe" Mayfield Sent: Monday, January 18,
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00399.html (10,214 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Wire mesh (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:34:48 -0700
- What you say makes sense. A structural engineer friend of mine spent several years designing concrete bridges and similar structures. He told me that, in theory, smaller reinforcing elements (assumin
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00401.html (12,306 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu