Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Windloading\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Windloading\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Windloading (score: 1): Author: jduncan@nol.net (John T. Duncan); Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 12:51:28 -0600; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0028_01BE3005.49DC59E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Regarding stacked array; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00406.html (9,423 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Windloading (score: 1): Author: alsopb@gloryroad.net (alsopb); Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 20:34:10 +0000; This brings up an interesting questions. Say your tower is rated for a 15 sq foot antenna. What if I put this antenna not at the top of a tower with 3 sets of guys but at the location of the second (; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00407.html (8,789 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Windloading (score: 1): Author: ni6w@yagistress.minden.nv.us (Kurt Andress); Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 21:57:17 -0800; Merry Christmas! Thanks to all for making my subscription to the reflector enjoyable and educational. windload ratings >of each antenna together to determine what size tower There are lots of formula; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00415.html (12,850 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Windloading (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1998 12:06:18 EST; Just add everything up (don't forget the mast and rotator or any appurtenances). The tower rating is for the WHOLE tower so where something is located isn't a factor. Don't forget to add the 8 sq.ft.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00416.html (8,550 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Windloading (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1998 12:06:20 EST; No. The 15 sq.ft. is the capacity for the WHOLE tower, regardless of where the load(s) actually is. Nope. It is typically the compression leg capacity that is the limiting factor. Cheers, Steve K7LXC; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00417.html (8,737 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Windloading (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1998 12:06:25 EST; According to the Rohn engineer that I talked to, the rating is for the WHOLE tower and is regardless of where the load is. Remember these towers are designed/configured for commercial applications wh; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00418.html (9,983 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Windloading (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1998 16:50:23 EST; Drake sayeth: Greetings, engineers, semi-engineers and other TowerTalkians - My tower loading remarks were expanded in a subsequent post to say that I was commenting on Rohn towers and the Rohn tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00419.html (9,632 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Windloading (score: 1): Author: d.dimitry" <d.dimitry@cwix.com (d.dimitry); Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1998 14:08:52 -0600; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0022_01BE30D9.44057F40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Part of a previous disc; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00420.html (14,085 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Windloading (score: 1): Author: ni6w@yagistress.minden.nv.us (Kurt Andress); Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 00:39:22 -0800; Seasons greetings, I don't doubt your presentation of what the Rohn people have advised. And we'll not make an arguement out of this whole deal. Rohn is telling you and everyone else that the total l; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00426.html (16,420 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Windloading (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 09:43:15 EST; Controversy? I don't think the topic is controversial. I APPRECIATE your knowledgeable and technical input. to subscribers It is. The whole idea of TowerTalk was to present a forum where questions (a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00427.html (10,947 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] Windloading (score: 1): Author: kg2au@stny.lrun.com (Jimmy Weierich); Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 10:54:59 -0500; snip We all know that many things are possible and safe "outside the box". I think that most of us know that we should seek professional engineering advice to determine exactly when, where and how fa; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00429.html (9,868 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] Windloading (score: 1): Author: ni6w@yagistress.minden.nv.us (Kurt Andress); Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 11:18:00 -0800; SNIP I think so too! We are also in ageement about telling everyone to follow or seek sound engineering when doing anything that can pose risk to life and property. We never run into this when discus; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00431.html (10,224 bytes)
13. [TowerTalk] Windloading (score: 1): Author: n8gan@n8gan.cnchost.com (KEN KOCH); Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 09:30:42 -0500; A golden opportunity for a 1st class PE to make some good money! Simply start charging for services to model each individual scenario...... Makes me wish I had the stamp. Ken -- FAQ on WWW: http://ww; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00442.html (8,028 bytes)
14. [TowerTalk] Windloading (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 12:42:13 -0500; Hi Kurt, One thing I learned about evaluating data is to take things to the limits and see what the changes are. of approach the same I'd wager that is exactly what is going on. The "telephone engine; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00443.html (9,249 bytes)
15. [TowerTalk] Windloading (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 10:50:10 EST; A local PE who does amateur plans for me and others in his spare time charges $250, a very reasonable fee. You need a PE stamp for your state and most don't pursue reciprocity for other states (even; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00444.html (8,384 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]