- 1. [TowerTalk] Who's on top? (score: 1)
- Author: tao@skypoint.com (Tod Olson)
- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 23:59:29 -0600
- I suspect that I could get this answer from a diligent search of the TT archives, but it is much more fun to get current thinking and experience. I am planning to install a 40 meter beam (40-2CD) on
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00136.html (8,075 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Who's on top? (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 06:24:05 -0600
- Hi Tod, I would put the 40M beam on top (80 ft). 40M antennas play VERY WELL at 80 to 100 ft. My experience with several High Band beams is that 80 to 100 ft sucks during the day when lower antennas
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00143.html (9,786 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Who's on top? (score: 1)
- Author: k6ll@juno.com (Dave Hachadorian)
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 06:46:44 +0000
- I'd put the antenna with the smallest windload (40) on top. Since the far-field pattern is composed of roughly equal parts of the direct ray and the ground-reflected ray, it doesn't matter if the nea
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00144.html (9,154 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Who's on top? (score: 1)
- Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten)
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:20:13 -0400
- K1VR: I mounted my TH6 at 97' on a five foot mast, and my 40-2CD at 90' on a RingRotor. Works beautifully, even when in line together (i.e., not 90 degrees of separation). Not a theoretical answer, b
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00145.html (8,062 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Who's on top? (score: 1)
- Author: marc.wullaert3@pandora.be (Marc Wullaert)
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 18:31:01 +0200
- Tod, The 40m beam shoud be on top.I have a semilair installation and 40-2cd is playing very well at 80feet some were.Under is a kt34xa.Don't turn the booms 90 degrees.I tried but got no differerence
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00152.html (9,433 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu