Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+WARNING\:\s+Enough\s+on\s+Texas\s+Towers\s+already\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+WARNING\:\s+Enough\s+on\s+Texas\s+Towers\s+already\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] WARNING: Enough on Texas Towers already (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 19:23:54 -0400 (EDT); OKAY, OKAY. This is not the "retailer bashing" reflector or anything close to it. Just because Texas Towers has "tower" in there name doesn't mean that it's okay to vent your spleen at (or endorse th; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00144.html (8,907 bytes)
2. Fwd: [TowerTalk] WARNING: Enough on Texas Towers already (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 20:50:20 -0400 (EDT); I believe this situation with Texas Towers has more than run it's course. However, considering this supplier is probably the largest for the members of this group... I think the information provided; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00148.html (8,127 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] WARNING: Enough on Texas Towers already (score: 1): Author: ad4hw@citrus.infi.net (Dan); Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 21:16:59 -0400; Hi OM's, I have developed tremendous respect for Steve & he has been a great help to me in recent months. I really appreciate this reflector & the way Steve oversees it. However, I agree with Bill on; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00150.html (9,371 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] WARNING: Enough on Texas Towers already (score: 1): Author: ftbrady@cosmoslink.net (Frank T. Brady); Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 19:06:58 -0700; I haven't bought a thing from TT (yet), but Gerald has been most helpful and forthcoming in his correspondence - often about products he doesn't even sell. So, I have no reason to bash TT. However, I; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00151.html (7,973 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]