Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+on\s+a\s+chain\s+link\s+fence\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+on\s+a\s+chain\s+link\s+fence\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Vertical on a chain link fence (score: 1): Author: "Jon Casamajor" <k6el@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:41:29 -0800; Hi folks, I am about to put a HF9V vertical up to supplement my 40m through 70Cm stack on my 72' crank up. I am primarily interested in 80m and 30m and I may add the 160m coil down the road a bit. In; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00562.html (7,374 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical on a chain link fence (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller WB5OXQ in Waco" <wb5oxq@grandecom.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:13:25 -0600; Looks like it should work but the pattern would not be as omnidirectional as if there were more radials. I am tempted to mount a vertical on top of a metal roof building that is 100X300' that is 20'; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00564.html (9,622 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical on a chain link fence (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:42:35 -0500; I ran an HF6V (with 160 coil) on a 4 foot chain link fence for CQWW one year and it worked quite well despite the fact that the base of the antenna and top of the fence were about 5 feet below a road; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00566.html (9,727 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]