Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+for\s+Tower\s+Top\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Vertical\s+for\s+Tower\s+Top\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Vertical for Tower Top (score: 1): Author: "Doug Rehman" <rehman@surveil.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:04:02 -0400; Lightning recently destroyed the Comet GP-15 (6m/2m/70cm) at the top of my tower's mast. I'm looking for a replacement that is more mechanically stout, one that might stand a chance at surviving the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01003.html (8,721 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical for Tower Top (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:46:00 -0400; Even side mounted near the top but upside down? Lots of commercial 2 way sticks are mounted that way sharing a common side arm. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ ____________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01005.html (8,561 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical for Tower Top (score: 1): Author: "Doug Rehman" <rehman@surveil.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:51:31 -0400; The problem is that the 24' mast is loaded with other VHF and UHF antennas that would be degraded. If I moved it down to the top of the tower itself, I'd lose 24' of elevation. Doug K4AC ____________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01006.html (9,154 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical for Tower Top (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:26:02 -0400; I had problems keeping a Diamond tribander on the top of my mast, it was simply too flimsy to survive 100' above the tree line on my exposed hilltop. Solution was to side mount upside down and loose; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01010.html (10,753 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical for Tower Top (score: 1): Author: "David Jordan" <wa3gin@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:26:37 -0400; Put a 109" stainless steel whip at the top of the mast and ground it to the mast. It's a low cost method that might divert some of the lightning energy EMP...all bets off on a direct hit. Some guys p; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01011.html (9,328 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical for Tower Top (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:05:05 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:04:02 -0400, "Doug Rehman" <rehman@surveil.com> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Could you install a lightning rod which would extend above the top of the antenna?; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01017.html (9,171 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical for Tower Top (score: 1): Author: "Doug Rehman" <rehman@surveil.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:14:12 -0400; With 24' of mast above the thrust bearing, I'd like to avoid adding any more height and weight (read lever arm) above the top vertical. I'm considering the multiband j-pole made out of copper pipe si; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01019.html (10,244 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]