- 1. [TowerTalk] Van Gordon 1:1 (score: 1)
- Author: jbigham2@kc.rr.com (Gene Bigham)
- Date: Mon Jul 14 09:40:02 2003
- The only balun locally available was a Van Gordon 1:1 that I placed on the feed to my Cushcraft A3S beam. Seems to be working fine even with 500 watts for PSK/RTTY. Anyone have any specifications on
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-07/msg00201.html (6,786 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Van Gordon 1:1 (score: 1)
- Author: rwing@southwind.net (Randy Wing)
- Date: Tue Jul 15 00:01:37 2003
- Gene, I just picked one up today - there was NO specifications listed on the balun package nor in the operating instructions. Sorry, Randy N0LD The only balun locally available was a Van Gordon 1:1 t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-07/msg00207.html (7,681 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Van Gordon 1:1 (score: 1)
- Author: jbigham2@kc.rr.com (Gene Bigham)
- Date: Tue Jul 15 08:43:39 2003
- Well the balun checks out as a voltage type and I have been believing it was a current type. I did the ohm meter check on the coax and it showed a dc short across the coax. I suppose given the symmet
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-07/msg00213.html (7,164 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Van Gordon 1:1 (score: 1)
- Author: w7ry@centurytel.net (Jim)
- Date: Thu Jul 17 21:18:48 2003
- I have cut several Van Gordon baluns apart. They are tri-filer wound with #14 on a 3/4" PVC pipe form about 2.5 to 3" long. Pretty simple. The worst problem that I have had with many balun manufactur
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-07/msg00288.html (8,778 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Van Gordon 1:1 (score: 1)
- Author: richard@karlquist.com (Richard Karlquist)
- Date: Fri Jul 18 01:06:46 2003
- These baluns have two major disadvanges: 1. They are *voltage* baluns. In all antenna applications I know of, you want a *current* balun. 2. They have excessive leakage and magnetizing inductance. T
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-07/msg00290.html (7,322 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu