Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+UV\s+and\s+WX\s+deterioration\s+of\s+THHN\s+insulation\,\s+and\s+effects\s+at\s+R\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects at R (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 18:49:05 -0600
I wouldn't call it "some kind of stake" as much as simple doubt because what you assert is, to be charitable, unsupported by observation. How long is "a long time?" Rob K5UJ ________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00319.html (7,220 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects at R (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 01:54:22 +0000 (UTC)
I knew this question was coming. C'mon Rob. Do you want it in weeks, days, months ? :-) Yes, the insulation deteriorates after it has been up for awhile............. I am interested in the stripping
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00320.html (8,285 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects at R (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger <k2av@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:01:53 -0500
"Unsupported by observation" You jest? The disintegration is very much supported by measurement and observation. Those measurements, and the methods used, are recently posted on this reflector. I wou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00322.html (9,419 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects at R (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger <k2av@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:28:24 -0500
A cadre of the NC East Chapter of PVRC, are meeting Thursday for lunch. Assuming we get enough to work the scene, and with a little luck with the weather, we should have a YouTube by the weekend. But
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00323.html (8,202 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects at R (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 22:30:17 -0700
Just curious if you think this is just a skin effect and if you were to use steel wool and shine the copper up after stripping if the copper acts normally or is there something happening chemically o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00324.html (10,266 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects at R (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger <k2av@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 01:16:47 -0500
My **GUESS** is that it's a deterioration of the surface portions of the copper, decomposition by-products of the inner insulation, held against the copper surface for extended periods, never washed
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00326.html (13,491 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] UV and WX deterioration of THHN insulation, and effects at R (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 05:31:59 -0600
No. By the way I gave you a pass on your snake oil FCP nonsense too but now I'm expecting you to try telling folks that the plastic on the wire _holds the RF in._ And I bet some will believe you. In
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00330.html (11,299 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu