Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+US\s+Tower\s+TX\-472\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+US\s+Tower\s+TX\-472\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Martin" <tmartin@chartermi.net>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 13:52:12 -0500; I lost my tower and antennas a few weeks ago in a storm and I am now considering a UST crank up. I received a decent price on the TX-472, with shipping from their Kansas plant a big break in costs. H; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00584.html (7,397 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: KJ6Y@aol.com; Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 15:52:23 EDT; Tom, The M2 Orion 2800 wiil fit inside the TX-472. Just be sure to order it with the round top plate instead of the standard 6 inch oval. I would also recommend you get the motor drive winch on the t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00585.html (7,163 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: Dino Darling <dino@k6rix.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 13:03:14 -0700; The LM-470 has a real nice tilt-over device which make working on your antenna much easier and probably the best recommendation for you. See it here... http://tashtowers.com/pdf/tiltover.pdf You coul; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00587.html (10,465 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 15:20:37 -0500; Makes sense that a large rotator will not fit in that tower. It's only rated for 10.3 sq ft at 70 mph. The antennas you listed will be much more than that. I have the same antennas (4 el SteppIR + XM; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00589.html (9,120 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: "William B. Stacy" <wstacy@wildblue.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:20:52 -0600; Hi, All: Some friends and I will remove a TX-472 this weekend and have two questions: 1. What size are the heads of the bolts and nuts used on the base plate? 2. Will the TRX-80 raising fixture work; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00531.html (7,288 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: Bill Gillenwater <gillie@pa.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:43:28 -0500; The nuts are 1 5/8 and yes the raising fixture will work. 73 bill k3sv _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00532.html (8,034 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: John Gager <k7kb.dx@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 15:13:03 -0800; Hi all. I'm currently in the planning stages for putting up a US Tower TX-472 Crank-Up 72 foot tower this spring. Although I would like the motorized crank-up, it adds about $1500 to the total cost o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00063.html (7,909 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: k6ye@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 23:24:24 +0000 (UTC); John, I have gone the crank-up route and much prefer the positive motor drive version. It only takes a view up and down manual operations to convince some that it is folly. While you are at it, consi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00064.html (8,870 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 18:26:30 -0500; John: Here's what I posted about my own Skyhawk: http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00164.html . One hint - When you assemble the Skyhawk's elements, insert all three pop; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00065.html (9,818 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 15:42:27 -0800; John, I would defiantly shell out the 1500 bucks, it will be hard to crank that size of tower up by hand. Plus if you change your mind in the future you will pretty much have no chance that US Tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00066.html (8,885 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: "N7US" <jim@n7us.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 17:56:10 -0600; How old are you? How's your health? How long to do expect to own the tower? I previously had a Hy-Gain 72' HG-70HD that wasn't positive pull-down and wasn't motorized. It took more time to crank it u; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00067.html (8,832 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: Mickey Baker <fishflorida@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 20:06:16 -0500; I agree with Mike and many other peope here: I would definitely defiantly shell out the 1500 bucks! It would be less than the shipping to the east coast! 73, Mickey N4MB -- Mickey Baker Fort Lauderda; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00068.html (10,742 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: "Michael Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 20:09:14 -0500; When you look at spending $1500 just after the Holidays it is a bite in the but. HOWEVER, I have the MD-75 motor drive on my HG-70D tower. I have the motor wired for 220 volt operation. It is quiet,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00069.html (12,387 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: "Victor Morris" <hurricane98@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 21:53:14 -1000; I would think twice about the US Tower motor, then think again. I recently purchased an MDP 750 motor for the TMM-433 HD tower. Despite a professional installation that exceeded stated US Tower specs; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00075.html (12,384 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: Dan Bookwalter <n8dcj@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 06:11:04 -0800 (PST); John I bought a TX-472 un-motorized :-( , i regret having not gotten the motorized version ever since !!!! the biggest advantage from my view point of having UST do it is that you also now have posit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00081.html (9,878 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:05:38 -0800; A good 1/2" drill and an adapter to the manual winch is another way to go, although it won't have pull down. My 2 speed gearbox variable speed motor reversible Milwaukee (Model # 5380-21 $160 at Home; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00091.html (10,000 bytes)
17. [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: John Gager <k7kb.dx@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 11:22:19 -0800; I really appreciate hearing everyone's thoughts on the TX-472. Seems the majority thinks it would be best to go with the motorized version however when I said yesterday that it only added $1500 to th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00094.html (9,583 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: "Steve Katz" <stevek@jmr.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 11:24:51 -0800; Get the TX-455 and use a longer mast! :-P 73 & good luck either way WB2WIK I really appreciate hearing everyone's thoughts on the TX-472. Seems the majority thinks it would be best to go with the mot; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00095.html (10,332 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: EZ <ezrhino@fastmovers.biz>; Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:31:32 -0700; You can always order the tower with the manual winch (K2550) and replace the crank handle with a cog, chain, another cog, and a geared motor down the road. This is what one of my buddies uses and it; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00096.html (10,614 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TX-472 (score: 1): Author: Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:02:35 -0500; I am glad i got the motor drive, with the positive pull down...especially when the wind is blowing , I can see how the tower would wait till the wind calms before you could let it down....and the pos; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00107.html (8,804 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]