Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+US\s+Tower\s+MA550\s+Coax\s+Feedline\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+US\s+Tower\s+MA550\s+Coax\s+Feedline\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] US Tower MA550 Coax Feedline (score: 1): Author: "Ripton, David" <RIPTOND@coned.com>; Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:21:49 -0400; Anyone have experience using LMR-600 Flex to feed a UHF antenna on a MA550 Tubular Tower? I plan on feeding 220 & 432 beams any need low-loss coax. I don't think 9913 or LMR 400 flex would give me a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00464.html (6,601 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower MA550 Coax Feedline (score: 1): Author: "James C. Garland" <4cx250b@muohio.edu>; Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:22:33 -0600; Dave, the different in loss between LMR400 and LMR600 for your application is not very much. Using the coax loss calculator at http://www.ocarc.ca/coax.htm I find that, at 440 MHZ, with a 60 ft run u; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00465.html (8,354 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower MA550 Coax Feedline (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:59:32 -0700 (PDT); I happen to have an MA550 tower but this posting is about my 106 ft HDX5106 tower. I am using large coax (7/8" OD) on this tower and made two decisions about this: 1. Instead of using the stock coax; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00467.html (8,484 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]