Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+U\s+S\s+Tower\s+Corp\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+U\s+S\s+Tower\s+Corp\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] U S Tower Corp (score: 1): Author: "Julio Peralta" <jperalta4@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 10:36:11 -0400; Just thinking out loud here and wondering what liability UST would have if an owner of one of their towers was injured or caused damage to his property or someone else's property while trying to serv; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00260.html (6,637 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] U S Tower Corp (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 17:59:25 -0700; Hi Julio On the other hand, what if someone did follow their instructions and someone got injured. Who would they go after? Nowadays, it's the 'deep pocket' syndrome--whoever has the most money will; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00262.html (7,579 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]