Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tying\s+80\s+and\s+160m\s+radials\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tying\s+80\s+and\s+160m\s+radials\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tying 80 and 160m radials (score: 1): Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 09:18:29 -0400; A tower is shunt fed for 160m and will be used to support 4 sq for 80m. A question is whether the radials systems for 160m and 80m should be strongly connected, weakly connected or disconnected. AC0C; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-05/msg00150.html (7,609 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tying 80 and 160m radials (score: 1): Author: "Tim Duffy" <k3lr@k3lr.com>; Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 09:52:37 -0400; Hello Ignacy: Strongly connected is the answer. When it comes to radials - more is always better. 73 Tim K3LR A tower is shunt fed for 160m and will be used to support 4 sq for 80m. A question is whe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-05/msg00151.html (7,999 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tying 80 and 160m radials (score: 1): Author: Rod Greene via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 15:46:11 +0000 (UTC); Ignacy, Tim is correct! In the 1980s I had a home brew 4 square on 80M and I had it installed and centered over a field of 100 radials. There were 50 radials 66 ft long and 50 radials 100 ft long and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-05/msg00152.html (9,365 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]