Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Two\s+15M\s+stacking\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Two 15M stacking (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:45:37 -0600
W4ZV: Check the results in my link above versus other MMs using much larger systems...I don't think you will find their much larger antennas make a significant difference. Obviously you have a good a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00415.html (8,044 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Two 15M stacking (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 07:28:44 -0500
K5GO: to know whether you could possibly lose anything because of the narrow beamwidth, you would have to look at the 3 dB beamwidth of the one with X gain and then compare it to the 6 dB beamwidth o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00418.html (7,596 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Two 15M stacking (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 09:29:43 EST
One added thought that will help reconcile K1TTT's experience with others on this subject: 3dB coverage of about 3200 miles in width. From this part of the world, that path would be about 1500 miles
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00419.html (9,310 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Two 15M stacking (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:27:38 -0500
From New England, Europe subtends approximately 40 degrees of azimuth (35 deg (TF) to 74 deg (ZB) from Boston). There may be some differences in opinion over how much additional coverage is necessary
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00428.html (8,780 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Two 15M stacking (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:30:54 +0000
Owl drink to that! _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00431.html (7,246 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Two 15M stacking (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:59:03 -0500
Oh, wench! Michael Keane K1MK k1mk@alum.mit.edu _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00433.html (7,697 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Two 15M stacking (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:53:00 -0500 (EST)
following areas with large contester populations: Azimuth Coverage area 22-25 UA4 and UA9 zone 17 22-30 Northern LA OH9 SM2 UA1Z 30-60 Continental Europe (DL, G, F, HA, HB, I, OK, SP, UA, YU etc) 60
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00438.html (10,436 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Two 15M stacking (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 02:12:01 -0000
Remember that beamwidth is definded as the points where the signal drops 3dB's from the main lobe. After this point the signal does not drop to zero. In many cases the signal strength of a large yagi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00449.html (8,401 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Two 15M stacking (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:25:56 -0000
Remember that beamwidth is definded as the points where the signal drops 3dB's from the main lobe. After this point the signal does not drop to zero. In many cases the signal strength of a large yagi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00455.html (8,310 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Two 15M stacking (score: 1)
Author: "Dean Straw" <n6bv@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:28:35 -0800
Towertalkians: I have a pdf I generated to answer the question "How narrow is too narrow?" This is for stateside contests from Northern California, but will illustrate the concept John, KK9A, talked
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00456.html (8,312 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu