Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tuners\s+and\s+Matchers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tuners\s+and\s+Matchers\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tuners and Matchers (score: 1): Author: Lee Buller <k0wa@swbell.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:55:11 -0800 (PST); Hello Ladies and Gents.... I have been researching tuners to determine which one to obtain. I have been getting mixed feelings about ... well ... just about all of them. So, I an asking for opinions; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00251.html (7,619 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tuners and Matchers (score: 1): Author: Don Havlicek <n8de@thepoint.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:06:18 -0500; Lee, Choice of a tuner depends mostly on what you're trying to tune .. ESPECIALLY on 160m. Remember that an antenna tuner serves only ONE purpose .. to 'match' the impedance at the shack-end of the f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00252.html (10,002 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tuners and Matchers (score: 1): Author: dan bookwalter <n8dcj@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:30:32 -0800 (PST); Lee one other thing to keep in mind is how much power you are going to be running... i used a tuner rated at 3KW that had a couple of pieces vaporized at around 1500... i just heard a little zap and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00253.html (11,928 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Tuners and Matchers (score: 1): Author: "Mark Beckwith" <mark@concertart.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:55:40 -0600; snip I'm using plain-ol' Dentrons on everything higher than 3.5 MHz. (some have had the inductor switch removed). For 160M I use a homebuilt T-network with big components and a pretty beefy coil. It; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00257.html (8,110 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tuners and Matchers (score: 1): Author: David Jordan <wa3gin@erols.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:17:34 -0500; The TenTECjk 238B matches 5-500ohms...not really much flexibility for an antenna buff. Mark Beckwith wrote: So, is the L-Match making a comeback in everyones thinking because depending on how you set; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00259.html (10,372 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Tuners and Matchers (score: 1): Author: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:25:27 -0800; One thing about the L-network is that it is either step-up or step-down, not both. Not too many antennas require both, however. A Pior T-network can be considered as two L-networks back-to-back, whic; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00260.html (9,179 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Tuners and Matchers (score: 1): Author: "Mark Beckwith" <mark@concertart.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:37:54 -0600; Yes, but an L-network is easily configurable, and if it is dedicated to a particular installation of a particular 160M wire, once you figure out which one you need, you hardwire it and you're done.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00261.html (7,935 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]