Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+True\s+Or\s+Not\s+True\s+\#2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+True\s+Or\s+Not\s+True\s+\#2\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] True Or Not True #2 (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (2); Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 10:09:55 -0700; On HF/MF skywave, is a 58% increase in power out (2db) noticable at the Rx end? - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wireless handles Roh; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00221.html (7,985 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] True Or Not True #2 (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (2); Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 10:09:55 -0700; On HF/MF skywave, is a 58% increase in power out (2db) noticable at the Rx end? - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wireless handles Roh; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00222.html (8,565 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] True Or Not True #2 (score: 1): Author: jon.ogden@cain-forlaw.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:14:29 -0500; I would say that it depends. If you are already 20 or 30 over 9 at the RX end then probably not. If you are right at the noise floor be it noise generated by any factor (bad band conditions, atmosph; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00223.html (9,087 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] True Or Not True #2 (score: 1): Author: mfarrer@tality.com (Mel Farrer); Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:17:26 -0700; I would agree, with one added comment. The definition of dB, as I remember, 1dB is the unit of sound level change that is detectable by the human ear. So if you are at the noise floor, yes it will ma; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00224.html (10,152 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] True Or Not True #2 (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger); Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:56:06 -0700 (PDT); In marginal conditions, such as daytime on the lower bands, or at the edges of a skip zone, etc, where the signal is at or in the noise, adding 2 db to your signal is helpful. For certain digital mod; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00225.html (11,185 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] True Or Not True #2 (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger); Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:18:56 -0700 (PDT); The definition of db is 10 log (powerA/powerB) and has NOTHING TO DO with human perception. (Where DID that old wive's tale come from...) The landmark Bell Laboratories study on how well average peop; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00226.html (12,602 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] True Or Not True #2 (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 15:21:02 -0400; Another angle to consider. 1-2 dB better signal may not be discernible on any given QSO. But over the course of a 48-hour DX contest, it may mean several dozen more European QRP stations with indoor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00227.html (9,672 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] True Or Not True #2 (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger); Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:36:53 -0700 (PDT); Maybe another way to put that: in a 48 hour contest, you can bet some significant number of contacts will individually qualify as marginal conditions (as in QRP & indoor antennas), and the 2 db will; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00228.html (11,195 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] True Or Not True #2 (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 15:05:00 -0600; HUH? You mean if 2 dB makes the difference between a QRP European hearing YOUR KW or not, do you really think YOU will hear HIS 5W? I think you need to re-think this argument Pete :-) I'll go along w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00232.html (10,155 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] True Or Not True #2 (score: 1): Author: pbarkey@bsu.edu (Barkey, Patrick M.); Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 15:57:26 -0500; As a purely logical matter, we must accept the fact that any increase in ERP produces a detectable difference in signal strength. Small increases in gain may require more perceptive instruments than; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00234.html (11,845 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] True Or Not True #2 (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 17:25:58 -0400; ... Absolutely, Tom -- I live in a quiet country environment, with a state-of-the-art receiver and directional antennas. My signal-to-noise ratio is a LOT higher than many of these disadvantaged stat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00237.html (9,702 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] True Or Not True #2 (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara); Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 23:50:43 +0200; Is there a chance to read a signal that produces 0 (zero) dB S/N ? What does it happen increasing that signal by 2 dB ? Is it detectable a 2 dB S/N ? Two divided by zero is equal to ? ....sleep well.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00242.html (8,703 bytes)
13. [TowerTalk] True Or Not True #2 (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com (TexasRF@aol.com); Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 10:58:27 EDT; A signal to noise ratio of 0 dB doesn't mean there is no signal but all noise; it means that the difference in amplitude of the signal and noise is 0 dB and that the amplitude of the signal and the n; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00275.html (9,087 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]