Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Triband\s+tests\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Triband\s+tests\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Triband tests (score: 1): Author: earlham@radiks.net (Iowaguy); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:06:02 -0500; Reflector crew. . . Just a thought on the triband testing thread. I work in the land mobile business (for Motorola) and have had my fair share of experience over the years with antennas used in our i; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00284.html (9,309 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Triband tests (score: 1): Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 13:13:33 -0400; Yes, I guess a more accurate test would be to run them all in vertical polarization on a fiberglass mast or end mounted for gain comparisons. Then mount them on a PVRC mount and flip them vertically; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00286.html (10,680 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Triband tests (score: 1): Author: Roger (Roger); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:41:24 -0500; Dave and Ty mentioned using vertical polarization for triband tests. This is usually NOT recommended for HF antennas on a ground-reflection range using the gain-transfer method. As stated in the IEEE; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00287.html (7,870 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Triband tests (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 13:35:41 -0400; Hi Dave, Then your test is a good one. First, the antennas are vertically polarized and at VHF and so don't face the same problems as measuring an antenna where a shift in polarity could produce extr; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00288.html (10,334 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Triband tests (score: 1): Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:19:26 -0400; His recommendations do not apply since we are not talking about ground-based antennas! Dave and Ty mentioned using vertical polarization for triband tests. This is usually NOT recommended for HF ante; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00290.html (8,680 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Triband tests (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:38:18 -0400; Hi Roger, For the very same reason, a LONG test distance is also not recommended for horizontal antennas. Moisture content, soil conductivity, and scattering all affect field strength since at a long; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00292.html (7,983 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Triband tests (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:14:27 -0000; It seems to me the best test for a tribander is two or more at similar heights not very far apart, and the test begins: Number one number one number one Number two number two number two et cetera...; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00294.html (8,626 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Triband tests (score: 1): Author: earlham@radiks.net (Iowaguy); Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 21:18:50 -0500; Tom: You have some very good points (as usual). I certainly wasn't meaning to advocate vertical polarization for HF yagi test! I'm still not sure how one goes about measuring relative (much less abso; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00301.html (11,360 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]