Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tri\-Ex\s+LM\-470D\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tri\-Ex\s+LM\-470D\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex LM-470D (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@connect.net (Phil Clements); Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 11:51:31 -0500; The house bracket will not help you, Bob. This tower is super stout when mounted in the recommended concrete base. I doubt if any mechanical advantage would be gained with a house bracket...the tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00598.html (7,546 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex LM-470D (score: 1): Author: DavidHarper@tx.slr.com (Harper, David); Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 12:25:53 -0500; The house that I rented for many years until recently was in very poor condition (the rent was extremely cheap and they let me put up a tower, so I didn't care!). A standing joke around here was tha; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00599.html (7,533 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Tri-Ex LM-470D (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay, KL7HF); Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 11:15:33 -0800 (AKDT); Note that stresses on the house foundation should be taken into account with a tower base that close. I would think that the house bracket might tend to assure that the forces were in the same plane.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00603.html (8,486 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]