Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Towers\s+falling\s+apart\s+\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Towers\s+falling\s+apart\s+\.\.\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Towers falling apart ... (score: 1): Author: Jari.Jussila@oh2bu.pp.fi (Jari Jussila); Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 15:01:37 +0300; A friend of mine has a severe problem with his neighbour demanding him to move his tower 3 meters further from his house. The house is 40 meters from the 42 meter high tower. The neighbour is afraid; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00467.html (8,465 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Towers falling apart ... (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC); Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 11:02:11 EDT; You're referring to the often cited Gunnar Olsen study. I have a copy and can send it to you. The 30% or so radius is correct but only for guyed towers. Selfsupporting towers will fall their full len; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00472.html (8,710 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Towers falling apart ... (score: 1): Author: DavidHarper@tx.slr.com (DavidHarper@tx.slr.com); Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 11:49:44 -0500; Going by memory, what I seem to recall from the previous threads on this was that most guyed towers fall into the 30% radius, but they can occasionally fall their full length, usually due to guy anc; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00476.html (8,848 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Towers falling apart ... (score: 1): Author: ttiruss@ldd.net (RUSSELL THOMPSON); Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 14:55:38 -0500; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --CB4765FDD88C47B20CA85CAC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have some information on tower falls. The data was; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00481.html (10,352 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Towers falling apart ... (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 19:34:10 -0600; Jari - The bad news is, IF the tower is guyed and IF the anchor or all of the guys fail, the tower will fall STRAIGHT OUT to it's FULL LENGTH. This happened to K0CS when the main bolt in an equilizer; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00493.html (9,535 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Towers falling apart ... (score: 1): Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten); Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 19:06:46 EDT; house is 40 meters from the 42 meter high tower. The neighbour is afraid that the tower Jari: I'd suggest that the friend add a second guy anchor point, INSIDE the existing guy anchor point, and tran; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00570.html (9,363 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Towers falling apart ... (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 03:00:49 -0700 (PDT); Steve, Wasn't that study done only on really tall towers like 500 or 600 feet or even taller? (Big commercial broadcast towers.) I think W7AGQ got a copy of that study (or a similar one) and there w; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00618.html (9,286 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]