Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TowerTalk\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+31\,\s+Issue\s+118\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TowerTalk\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+31\,\s+Issue\s+118\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 31, Issue 118 (score: 1): Author: "George Lee" <geokr5c@cablelynx.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:20:08 -0500; John, do you have a best method for knowing how the internal state of the legs will be? Thanks for the posting. 73, George KR5C _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscompu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00841.html (11,540 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 31, Issue 118 (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:45:49 -0500; That IS the problem! You just can't tell for sure. And I hate to risk my life and limb not knowing. There just isn't any sort of CHEAP non-destructive testing that I know of. You might make a coil ar; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00842.html (7,905 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 31, Issue 118 (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:03:39 -0400; When I worked in maintenance we had a relatively small, portable, electronic thickness gauge. As I recall, it'd measure different metals from a few thousandths to around half an inch. Back then I cou; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00849.html (10,214 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]