Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TowerTalk\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+232\,\s+Issue\s+16\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 232, Issue 16 (score: 1)
Author: GEO Badger via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 18:27:15 +0000 (UTC)
Ya think? hihi K9YC sez:>0.1% is probably a high number. Hey, I too have that one, again not a first edition. He was a great teacher.  One of my wife's flute teachers had a glass flute with sand it i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-04/msg00078.html (8,517 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 232, Issue 16 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Mader <k8te.bill.mader@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 12:44:46 -0600
Regarding the POTA guys, most are like crows. They like short and shiney things like WRC stuff. There is an inverse relationship between an antenna's hype (paid advertising or not) and its performan
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-04/msg00079.html (7,285 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 232, Issue 16 (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 13:24:11 -0600
Nobody wants to admit they bought a bad item or an under performing one. W0MU Ha! 0.01% is definitely too high for antenna understanding, Jim, K9YC. Regarding the POTA guys, most are like crows. They
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-04/msg00080.html (8,077 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 232, Issue 16 (score: 1)
Author: Richard Karlquist <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 12:58:46 -0700
A corollary to this generalization: I have tried to report that I wasted my money on a piece of junk. Inevitably, I get flamed by other people who also bought the same item. They act like I am critic
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-04/msg00081.html (9,434 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu