Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TowerTalk\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+158\,\s+Issue\s+20\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 158, Issue 20 (score: 1)
Author: Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 17:41:44 +0000
Exactly. Look at the map. Some adjacent sections jump abruptly from the lowest conductivity to the highest. Santa Fe, N Mexico is a good example, where it's 15 on one side of the line, and just to t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00095.html (7,936 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 158, Issue 20 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:01:39 -0800
How do you know that, Don? I worked in Pete Johnson's consulting office in the '60s.Pete, along with Carl Smith (of Cleveland Radio and Electronics Institute) wrote the FCC's technical rules for AM b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00098.html (8,583 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 158, Issue 20 (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:49:57 -0800
73 John N5CQ Exactly. Look at the map. Some adjacent sections jump abruptly from the lowest conductivity to the highest. Santa Fe, N Mexico is a good example, where it's 15 on one side of the line,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00100.html (8,733 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 158, Issue 20 (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:18:03 -0800
You know the actual contours would rarely, if ever, precisely follow the boundaries shown on the map, jumping abruptly from low conductivity at one point, to high conductivity just a few feet to the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00101.html (9,995 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 158, Issue 20 (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 08:56:10 -0600
It would be reasonable to assume that you are more likely to have a high conductivity soil condition inside such a designated area rather than in an area mapped as low conductivity but undepicted exc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00116.html (9,241 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 158, Issue 20 (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 08:23:38 -0800
Now regarding Beverage antennas... Please excuse my ignorance (The cowboy philosopher Will Rogers said, "We are all ignorant, just about different things") but could someone please give me a little
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00120.html (10,838 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 158, Issue 20 (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:56:00 -0600
Rick, I have cross fences which run E-W and N-S diving the ranch into 4 equal square chunks of 40 acres each. These fences are, of course, 1/2 mile long. They are 5 wire barbed wire with T-posts roug
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00128.html (12,359 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 158, Issue 20 (score: 1)
Author: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:09:49 -0500
Patrick Your beverage direction N / S E / W are not the best direction for DX and I am not sure about the coupling from the strands of barber wire below it ? ( I think this would be an issue ) As for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00130.html (14,304 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 158, Issue 20 (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 15:40:24 -0600
On 2/10/2016 3:09 PM, Wayne Kline wrote: Patrick Your beverage direction N / S E / W are not the best direction for DX and I am not sure about the coupling from the strands of barber wire below it ?
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00131.html (9,413 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 158, Issue 20 (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:10:00 -0800
centers. I was thinking of attaching extensions to the T-posts to get more elevation for the Beverage as the T-posts' tops are at about 4 1/3 ft above ground. If te antenna were to pass by a gate it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00137.html (10,161 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu