Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TowerTalk\]\s+portable\s+verticals\s+with\s+crummy\s+ground\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TowerTalk\]\s+portable\s+verticals\s+with\s+crummy\s+ground\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] TowerTalk] portable verticals with crummy ground (score: 1): Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 14:09:24 +0100 (BST); My experience (admittedly really limited to 160m) is that it is pretty easy to get ~50% efficiency. It is pretty hard to get close to 100%. My justification for saying this is that at one point I had; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00065.html (7,788 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk] portable verticals with crummy ground (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 07:08:13 -0700; Or, perhaps, an incentive to do a "system design", especially for portable ops. You might be better off with a big amp and a crummy antenna than barefoot and a good antenna that takes hours to set up; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00066.html (9,211 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]