Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+loading\.\.\.\s+again\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower loading... again... (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:23:59 -0700
I am sure this has been covered many times over... if there is an article or three please let me know the url... meanwhile: I have read many times over how people REALLY seriously overload their towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00190.html (8,181 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower loading... again... (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck O'Neal" <cdoneal@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 00:46:44 -0400
"Would this tower handle a 2EL 80 meter beam at the top (134')? " I had a modified (by me, 65ft long boom and more overhead trussing) KLM 3E 75M yagi on top of 110 ft of Rohn 45 for 8 years. This arr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00191.html (9,683 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower loading... again... (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:41:49 -0500
and LOL! You are lucky that the guys kept the tower from buckling. I am planning to use 55G for my next tower which will have a Sigma-280 Magnum at 195 feet. Keith NM5G --Original Message-- From: to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00194.html (11,091 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu