Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+and\s+property\s+values\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower and property values (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 18:54:05 -0500
Howdy, TowerTalkians -- I pulled this off the ham-law reflector and I thought you'd be interested in it. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH - Professional tower services for commercial and amateur I read
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00120.html (8,303 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and property values (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:23:41 -0500
And I had always figured if it lowered the property value, I should have lower property taxes, and when the neighbor wants to sell his acreage, I should get it for a lower price! At a minimum, maybe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00121.html (10,975 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and property values (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:33:09 -0500
Adding a serious comment to my previous "tongue in cheek" one, this could be further evidence that towers do not, indeed, lower property values: 1. Do local jurisdictions lower your tax assessment or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00122.html (10,918 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and property values (score: 1)
Author: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:04:19 -0600
in it. classic line about "lowering property values" was of interest to me. You see, I have heard this line (or more properly, lie) for so long and it wasn't until I had received training and licens
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00123.html (8,975 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and property values (score: 1)
Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:21:52 -0800
How about asking your municipality to lower your property taxes because your antennas have lowered the value of your property. Once they finish laughing you should get a nice letter turning down your
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00124.html (8,382 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and property values (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 23:04:09 -0500
TT: My county government gives me annual proof of how erroneous that argument really is - my property appraisal letter. Property taxes never have gone down, even AFTER I installed my tower. (Bet my n
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00126.html (11,284 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and property values (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 23:05:51 -0500
Rich: I just poseted an almost identical letter. You and I must live in the same jurisdiction - The Peoples' Republic of Montgomery County, Maryland. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F be tax were interested could
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00127.html (13,596 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and property values (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 11:36:05 EST
In a message dated 2/4/2005 7:23:09 PM Central Standard Time, jimsmith@shaw.ca writes: How about asking your municipality to lower your property taxes because your antennas have lowered the value of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00132.html (9,197 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and property values (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 11:48:21 EST
In a message dated 2/5/05 4:37:37 PM Greenwich Standard Time, Jamesnf@aol.com writes: Here in the suburbs of Chicago, I've always found the best strategy to be to not poke the sleeping bear. I agree.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00133.html (8,700 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu