Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+and\s+Antenna\s+Work\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+and\s+Antenna\s+Work\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower and Antenna Work (score: 1): Author: "Timothy A. Holmes" <taholmes160@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:10:36 -0500; Hi Folks: Spent part of the day outside today re-rigging the balun on my ladderline fed doublet. Got me thinking about my antenna system and the work that needs done to it. The system is as follows:; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00269.html (14,318 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and Antenna Work (score: 1): Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:10:12 -0800; Tim, The first thing I see is that the tri-bander needs to be higher to get reasonable DX performance. From what you described the tri-bander is at 22 feet high and a 6M beam at 27 feet. Is 27 feet t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00270.html (11,950 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and Antenna Work (score: 1): Author: "Timothy A. Holmes" <taholmes160@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 18:04:59 -0500; Ok, that makes sense Bob: 27 feet (or maybe slightly more) is the top of the mast right now. I would LOVE to put another tower section on, but right now cannot afford it. As far as performance, both; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00273.html (12,381 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]