Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+and\s+\/\s+or\s+property\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: Gary Stone <n5phtgs@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:46:39 -0600
Questions about tower and property. I have the following set up: 80 foot Rohn 45G guyed with poly (non conductive - can't recall the name right now) guys. First question: if I decided to sell the tow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00193.html (7,878 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:55:57 -0800
KA9FOX has a great classified site http://swap.qth.com/ . Personally I always listed my home without towers to maximize the potential buyers. I don't know of any homes with stations in the US that we
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00205.html (8,542 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: Big Don <bigdon39@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 02:22:59 -0800
If you are close-in to a population center, and have a tower(s) that is "grandfathered" in from many years ago, before CC&Rs, before all the outrageous abusive fascist controlling city/county plannin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00210.html (9,286 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 18:15:10 -0500
Often any "grandfathering" the municipality does for things like a tower will only apply to the current owner. Meaning once that owner sells the property the tower has no more rights. 73 Gary K4FMX _
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00227.html (12,058 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 15:28:38 -0800
No, Look up "Appurtenance", a tower is fixed to the land, like an orchard, barn etc. and is incident to the land to which it is attached. If it is there it will be transferred with the land. Mike --O
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00229.html (12,981 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: Gary Stone <n5phtgs@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 17:37:54 -0600
_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00230.html (13,963 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:51:48 -0800
Value is what someone would pay for it. I can't imagine another ham paying more than $10k for any existing used tower setup (which is probably in very used condition) on the other end, it might be wo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00233.html (9,066 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 15:53:32 -0800
Does not matter what you worry about or you local town worries about or if you even have a permit, it is real estate law and if you sell the house and the tower is there when a offer is submitted it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00234.html (13,536 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:59:47 -0700
I am a real estate agent in Colorado and Montana. In my practice there are just not enough hams buying property compared to the overall public, so there is very little value in trying to sell the hom
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00235.html (11,939 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:02:05 -0700
Not if the Seller has specifically excluded it in the contract. Mike W0MU W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ To
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00236.html (16,082 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:03:45 -0800
You are correct, it is like a swimming pool, some may pay more than the appraised value for it, other like me may see it as a nuisance and so has no value, a tower is the same way except fewer people
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00237.html (11,055 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:07:32 -0800
Well of course, that goes without saying. The original post was/could the tower transfer with the property and yes it can and will unless you specifically exclude it. Mike Not if the Seller has speci
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00238.html (17,316 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 17:19:19 -0700
When I sold my place, I gave away the tower and had the protrusions above the concrete cut off with a torch. Then I stuck a $15 kettle barby on the concrete pier. No problem !! 73, Dick, W1KSZ ps: th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00240.html (12,338 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:20:12 -0800
I suppose I should also add that the tower better be there if not excluded when the new owner and agent do their walk through. Mike Well of course, that goes without saying. The original post was/cou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00241.html (18,358 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:29:36 -0800
Been here 20 years and will have two bases to hide or get rid of, think I will knock the top foot or so off them and plant grass. I just feel sorry for the next owner thinking all he has to do is bre
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00243.html (13,169 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: "Gary \"Joe\" Mayfield" <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 22:13:45 -0600
I bought a tower with an attached house once. I probably paid too much, but I really liked the idea of neighbors that were already used to ham radio. We never broke out what I was paying for the towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00250.html (13,331 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:15:55 -0500 (EST)
Howdy, TowerTalkians -- Interesting thread but at the threat of being a nuisance, this post has been re-re-re-re-re-posted five times with no editing and it just gets longer and longer. I wouldn't mi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00256.html (8,142 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: flastormwatcher@aol.com
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 14:39:11 -0500 (EST)
Intresting thread. Consider an alternative sales strategy: Explain the tower as a tower for off-the-air digital TV antenna. Towers for this purpose usually are unregulated! 73 Dave KB3GYN ___________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00257.html (8,185 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 17:41:05 -0500 (EST)
as are antennas for WISP. Bill K4XS In a message dated 12/9/2011 7:39:33 P.M. Greenwich Standard Time, flastormwatcher@aol.com writes: Intresting thread. Consider an alternative sales strategy: Expla
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00260.html (8,466 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and / or property (score: 1)
Author: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 18:42:26 -0500
Bill Hams have to do what Hams have to do , When I moved to my current QTH it was ?? as what a tower was a Structure a Spire ( which had no height restrictions) and in this rural ara anything having
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00261.html (10,472 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu