Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Remote\s+Control\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Tower\s+Remote\s+Control\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower Remote Control (score: 1): Author: "Bill Erickson" <ericksonw@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:48:08 -0700; I have a Tri-Ex LM-470 motorized crank up tower. I would like to be able to remotely control it from my ham shack. The only remote control system that I have been able to find is the original system; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00512.html (6,865 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Remote Control (score: 1): Author: RWMaylott@aol.com; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:36:26 EDT; Tashjian Towers (www.tashtowers.com) may be able to help, as they have assumed the Tri-Ex line. My more modern version (mfg. by Paragon, sold through First Call Communications, about 6 years ago) use; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00516.html (7,585 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Remote Control (score: 1): Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:47:09 -0400; I have both of my LM-470s remotely operated. All I did was parallel the existing switch on the tower with an identical remote switch in the shack. It requires paralleling six wires and bringing them; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00517.html (8,787 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Remote Control (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:05:36 EDT; to remotely control it from my ham shack. The only remote control system that I have been able to find is the original system that was offered by Tri-Ex. My concern with that system is that it uses (; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00519.html (8,470 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Remote Control (score: 1): Author: Edward Sylvester <navydude1962@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:20:12 -0700 (PDT); Amen....It's happened to me. Not safe unless there is absolutely positive pull down. I experienced this nightmare at night and saw the tower sectiones come crashing down. Could have lost a limb.....; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00520.html (9,807 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Remote Control (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:19:55 -0700 (PDT); Someone posted here a while back that some UST crankups not only have positive pull down, but also continuous height readout. I think it was marketed to commercial users who needed to set the antenna; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00524.html (12,773 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Remote Control (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:35:37 -0400; Well, some of us have to do it. My crankup tower is 265' from the shack behind a tall stand of trees. If I squint real hard, I can sometimes see one of the antenna elements through the foliage. But m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00542.html (13,209 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Remote Control (score: 1): Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:50:51 -0500; Measure the time to raise, divide by the delta-height, and use a stopwatch to raise or lower; I see about 10 feet per minute, so I can be pretty precise. 73 Barry, W5GN ______________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00559.html (7,831 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Remote Control (score: 1): Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:26:05 -0400; I have to agree with Dick. I can visually observe one of my towers and the cables from my shack window. The other one is 300 feet away and visible through another house window but not from the shack.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00657.html (16,065 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]