Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Topband\:\s+RFI\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Topband\:\s+RFI\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: RFI (score: 1): Author: "Wm. Freddy Curtis" <curtisf@dtccom.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:59:27 -0600; John, I had a similar problem with the Yaesu G-450XL controller. I had got an Ameritron-811H Amp into an Inverted L 3 ft from tower. I fried the controller. Got a used controller off of e-bay, howeve; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00760.html (8,113 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: RFI (score: 1): Author: "Wm. Freddy Curtis" <curtisf@dtccom.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:47:03 -0600; Todd, My Inverted L was much better on DX than my 160 Meter dipole or 160 meter+ loop. I have worked HI and the VP6 last season. I have worked numerous countries in the Caribbean, Central and South A; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00771.html (11,158 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: RFI (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:11:07 -0800; What does this have to do with RFI? 73, Jim _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://list; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00000.html (6,244 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: RFI (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 14:31:08 -0500; I think he means his favorite antenna causes RFI problems with his rotator controller. But he took a minute to "boast" a bit about how well it works, which explains why he wants to fix the RFI proble; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00015.html (7,650 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: RFI (score: 1): Author: "Julio Peralta" <jperalta4@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:29:09 -0500; John try a line isolator. They can be purchased from several ham manufactures. MFJ, The wireman and DX engineering are a few of the folks that I know make them. I and a couple of my friends have been; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00023.html (9,955 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: RFI (score: 1): Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>; Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:04:26 -0400; Many years ago when I had a bad location for line noise, I used a wideband scanner that could be kept in AM mode over the whole range of frequencies, and a small VHF/UHF TV log-yagi with a battery po; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-06/msg00182.html (8,021 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: RFI (score: 1): Author: "Mike Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:52:59 -0400; As I recall that MJF handheld noise 'sniffer' is actually on the 137mhz band (just above the air band I think?) I've used those to some extent though the recvr is not selective that's actually a good; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-06/msg00183.html (8,997 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: RFI (score: 1): Author: Neal Sulmeyer <Neal@K4EA.NET>; Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:18:44 -0400; I have had one for over 20 years. First thing I did was to disconnect the "rabbit ears" and connect the input to a BNC connector. I use a 4 element 144 mhz. Works just fine. MFJ also makes an ultraso; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-06/msg00184.html (10,358 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: RFI (score: 1): Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>; Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 20:54:12 -0400; I should have made that clear, yes you start off at lower frequencies, and gradually tune higher & higher as you get closer to the source. I found it to be the fastest method with what I had at the t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-06/msg00185.html (8,989 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]