Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Topband\:\s+160m\s+Sloper\s+on\s+Crank\-up\s+tower\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Topband\:\s+160m\s+Sloper\s+on\s+Crank\-up\s+tower\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: 160m Sloper on Crank-up tower (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:18:36 -0500; It's difficult to make a 160 sloper work very well with only a 54 ft tower. (That's a quarter wave sloping wire, not a half wave sloping dipole.) The configuration that works the best is one in which; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00551.html (10,194 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: 160m Sloper on Crank-up tower (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:23:58 -0500; Darn it. I did it again, sent it to the wrong reflector. Please disregard. Jerry _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00559.html (11,620 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]