Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Testing\s+chokes\s+with\s+31\s+material\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Testing\s+chokes\s+with\s+31\s+material\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Testing chokes with 31 material (score: 1): Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>; Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:59:16 -0600; Hi Ron: as you have described. I have the AIM 4170C from W5BIG, but it is not a VNA. I think the VNA instrument is an AIM 2180 and the AIM 4170 is an antenna Analyzer. I tried using the AIM 4170 to m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00447.html (11,646 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Testing chokes with 31 material (score: 1): Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>; Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:02:02 -0600; RonL A follow up to my earlier response with respect to measuring the chokes using an AMI 4170. This afternoon I measured two chokes with the AIM 4170 and ploted the results on the two cores, 4 turns; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00467.html (8,998 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Testing chokes with 31 material (score: 1): Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:23:15 +0100; I'm surprised there was so much difference with the AIM results; I've made the same comparison myself and not seen anything like that sort of difference. I wonder how you calibrated the AIM4170 befor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00484.html (8,036 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]