Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Telrex\s+Monoband\s+matching\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Telrex\s+Monoband\s+matching\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Telrex Monoband matching (score: 1): Author: NPAlex@aol.com; Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 23:29:18 EDT; Paul, Additional comment on matching your TELREX mono band beams. Regarding the two comments below, the Mono-bands did use a Tee matching system set for about 50 ohms impedence. This system was feed; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00040.html (9,300 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Telrex Monoband matching (score: 1): Author: "David Jordan" <wa3gin@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 11:07:48 -0400; ...the wire is actually inside the balun box (not the 10m trap), but it was stated to me that the wire was added to improve 10m matching. I have an open one in the country if anyone wants to see the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00064.html (8,356 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Telrex Monoband matching (score: 1): Author: "Paul Cassel" <paul@ve3sy.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 11:31:21 -0400; The 3 antennas I have purchased and am currently assembling are Mono Band antennas and not the tri-band model. The model numbers are 10M-532, 15M-532 and 20M-436 - however I appreciate everyone's com; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00066.html (10,189 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Telrex Monoband matching (score: 1): Author: NPAlex@aol.com; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 11:52:17 EDT; Paul, I think you will find that the Coax BalUn cable length is 1/2 wL to get a 180deg phase shift and create the "balanced" feed. When the voltage is "high" on terminal 1, it is "LOW" on terminal 2; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00070.html (7,709 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Telrex Monoband matching (score: 1): Author: "Paul Cassel" <paul@ve3sy.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:56:20 +0000; Ok - good point re QRO as I run an ALPHA 87A. best regards _________________________________ Paul Cassel (519) 634-5139 home (519) 749-7427 Blackberry Paul, I think you will find that the Coax BalUn; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00072.html (9,065 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Telrex Monoband matching (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 21:43:51 +0200; Sure about a 1/4 wave balun? To step up from 50 to 200 Ohms a 1/2 wave balun is needed. 73 Peter Now for the matching - the consensus for the T match is something in the 200 ohm range requiring a 4:1; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00092.html (8,278 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Telrex Monoband matching (score: 1): Author: "Paul Cassel" <paul@ve3sy.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 15:47:06 -0400; Sorry folks - a typo - it is in fact a 1/2 coaxial balun. Paul VE3SY _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00093.html (8,799 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]