Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+TA\-33\s+Mosley\s+Senior\-Choke\s+Balun\s+needed\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] TA-33 Mosley Senior-Choke Balun needed? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Allen <mcamp@gmavt.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:13:38 -0400
Hi, We were working on our 2 Field Day antennas and the question came up about choke baluns and whether they are needed on this antenna. The manufacturer say no but Cushcraft's instructions for one o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00407.html (7,448 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33 Mosley Senior-Choke Balun needed? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill VanAlstyne" <w5wvo@cybermesa.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:57:13 -0600
If you look at Mosley's website (http://www.mosley-electronics.com/faq.htm), they clearly use their split-dipole direct-feed approach as a marketing strategy -- simplicity, stability, etc. But any ra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00408.html (10,211 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] TA-33 Mosley Senior-Choke Balun needed? (score: 1)
Author: "James R. Duffey" <JamesDuffey@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:43:48 -0600
Bill - You asked "We know that common-mode currents on the coax CAN cause problems -- and since it's so easy to prevent this, why not do it?" It is good engineering practice to use a balun whenever a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00424.html (8,050 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33 Mosley Senior-Choke Balun needed? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:47:54 +0000
A good ham friend of mine in former East Germany, together with a very reputable German antenna specialist, many years ago made some measurements of 432 MHz yagis fed with split dipoles and coax look
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00425.html (12,257 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33 Mosley Senior-Choke Balun needed? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:11:23 -0400
The worse thing about any debate is all the bad data that pours out of well-intentioned but totally meaningless efforts to prove or disprove points. with a very some measurements for pattern baluns f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00429.html (13,317 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33 Mosley Senior-Choke Balun needed? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:34:23 +0000
Tom, if I say that the test were made at 432 MHz and they were pretty conclusive, they were. On 432 MHz ! If relevant to HF is another matter, and therefore I stated nothing but 432 MHz, clearly reme
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00430.html (10,584 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33 Mosley Senior-Choke Balun needed? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:20:59 -0400
Hi Peter, This is all a very important discussion!! were pretty No. The test was only pretty conclusive for that exact test setup including cable lengths and types and that antenna on 432MHz. The tes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00431.html (11,679 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33 Mosley Senior-Choke Balun needed? (score: 1)
Author: Lee Buller <k0wa@swbell.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Wow, What a great question and what a great bunch of answers. I too have used the TA-33 and have used the recommended choke balun, a 1:1 balun with a toroidal core, and feeding the thing directly. Fr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00432.html (9,560 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33 Mosley Senior-Choke Balun needed? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:18:29 -0400
methods, I can tell you this: The TA-33 will radiate poorly in any direction it is pointed. As far as I was concerned the TA-33 could have been a dipole or even a high 50 ohm resistor because it did
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00441.html (11,824 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] TA-33 Mosley Senior-Choke Balun needed? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:38:48 +0000
And the even so, the pattern on VHF/UHF yagis can be so good that in practice you will not notice any difference. This is also true. Tested and proven, a number of times by myself and others. 73/Pete
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00457.html (9,015 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu