Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+T\s+Matches\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+T\s+Matches\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] T Matches (score: 1): Author: Chuck Smallhouse <w7cs@theriver.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 21:33:40 -0700; 200:50 ohm coax balun. Several of them had the main lobe canted off to one side by 20 degs ! The fix was to replace the T match with a conventional hairpin setup. He did not mention the brand, but I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00518.html (7,743 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] T Matches (score: 1): Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 03:55:46 -0500; I'd agree with Chuck and Jim: a 20-degree squint from a correctly constructed T-match just isn't possible. To produce a squint of that magnitude, something at the feedpoint would need to be grossly w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00519.html (9,707 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]