Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+SteppIR\s+vs\s+Butternut\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+SteppIR\s+vs\s+Butternut\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] SteppIR vs Butternut (score: 1): Author: "Larry & Karen" <k0is@iowatelecom.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:32:37 -0500; In the next couple days or so I will be ordering a 3 element SteppIR yagi and can't decide whether adding the 30/40 meter option would be worthwhile or not. Maybe it's a no brainer, but currently on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00438.html (7,356 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR vs Butternut (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:04:14 -0600; Larry, If you can afford the 30/40 then get it. I use the 30/40 on 30m as I have a 2 ele 40 above my SteppIR. One can never have enough antennas and options. You might hear stations better on the Ste; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00443.html (8,791 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR vs Butternut (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:39:24 EDT; and can't decide whether adding the 30/40 meter option would be worthwhile or not. Maybe it's a no brainer, but currently on 30 and 40 meters I have two other antennas, an extended double zepp at abo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00459.html (8,066 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR vs Butternut (score: 1): Author: KG4LRU@aol.com; Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:56:03 EDT; Steve I have exactly what your talking about had butternut HV 9 Bought a 3 element SteppIR in 2002 and their Big IR vertical . Both worked better than expected. Then I upgraded to the 30/40 kit its l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00467.html (7,840 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR vs Butternut (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:39:08 -0400; Man with two watches never knows what time it is... Not on topic, but makes me think of why one might want only one antenna per band. Just posing the other side of the argument. ;-) == K8JHR == == __; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00502.html (7,928 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR vs Butternut (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:47:53 EDT; one antenna per band. Want? You mean like physical limitations? Cost? XYL? Zoning? CC&R's? HOA's? Zoning restrictions? Nasty neighbors? I guess I just don't understand your argument. Like I said befo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00505.html (7,901 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR vs Butternut (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:52:44 -0400; Sorry.... misplaced attempt at humor... This attempt totally missed the mark. Sorry for the wasted bandwidth. (Sheepish grin.) Happy trails. == JHR == _______________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00511.html (7,831 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]