Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+SteppIR\s+vs\.\s+th7\s+stack\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+SteppIR\s+vs\.\s+th7\s+stack\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR vs. th7 stack (score: 1): Author: jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 12:34:47 -0500; Ken, You dont say what the heights are for the stack. My inclination would be to replace the upper th7 with the 4 el steppir, keeping the tic ring for the lower unit. You MIGHT find the th7 you're ta; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00092.html (7,388 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR vs. th7 stack (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:13:56 EST; You dont say what the heights are for the stack. My inclination would be to replace the upper th7 with the 4 el steppir, keeping the tic ring for the lower unit. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00101.html (7,902 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR vs. th7 stack (score: 1): Author: "Michael Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:00:15 -0500; Bill, I know we will be hearing about and HEARING your 3 stack setup for a long time. Next time I drive by there on vacation again out there, I will stop by. And about the side mounts, when I was in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00103.html (9,981 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR vs. th7 stack (score: 1): Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:42:56 -0500; There is probably not enough difference to tell. With the tri-banders (TH-7 or KT-34/36XA) you are limited to 10, 15, and 20 so if you want 12 and 17 stay with the SteppIR. There is a ham near Atlant; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00106.html (7,552 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR vs. th7 stack (score: 1): Author: "W3JK" <w3jk@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:21:14 -0500; The stacks are at 35/72 feet. I modeled using the HFTA software and 72ft is the best height for my location and the results start diminishing if I go higher. The current TH7 stack does a great job an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00107.html (8,769 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR vs. th7 stack (score: 1): Author: Mike <k4gmh@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 09:31:34 -0500; Good suggestion, Jim, regarding the use of the TH7 being fixed in the SE direction. That is what I have, sort of, at this location. A TH7 stack was replaced by a pair of 4 element SteppIRs. A TH6 is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00116.html (9,302 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]