Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+SteppIR\s+Redux\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] SteppIR Redux (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 16:36:37 -0000
Rob aka: Rob Frohne, Ph.D., P.E. E.F. Cross School of Engineering Walla Walla College http://www.wwc.edu/~frohro/ wrote: If nobody creates new prototypes, then the state of the art never advances. It
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00114.html (8,998 bytes)

2. RE: [TowerTalk] SteppIR Redux (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 18:13:43 -0400
SteppIR have already done that. The MonstIR was advertised in the May 2004 QST. The cost is high but without careful shopping I do not think that one could purchase equivalent performance (a stack o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00118.html (8,961 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR Redux (score: 1)
Author: "on4kj" <on4kj@skynet.be>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 01:00:17 +0200
Some one would explain the meaning of ........ (e.g., when one is up to one's ass in alligators, etc.........). Jos on4kj _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00119.html (8,037 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR Redux (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 18:19:04 -0500
Just as a point of reference, I ordered a 3 element SteppIR on March 1, 2004. I called, again, last week and was told that it would be about another 2 weeks. For what it is worth. 73, Bernard, WA4OEJ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00120.html (11,358 bytes)

5. RE: [TowerTalk] SteppIR Redux (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 16:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Here's a challenge to SteppIR wannabes: Figure out how to make the elements of retractable tubing, so when not in use, they collapse down to 3 feet (each side) or whatever. This would reduce the 2 el
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00121.html (8,460 bytes)

6. RE: [TowerTalk] SteppIR Redux (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 19:38:44 -0400
Actually, I think one could probably use the very same technology as SteppIR are currently using but fix the end of the BeCu strip to the tip of the fiberglass tube. If the tubes were not "locked" i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00122.html (8,595 bytes)

7. RE: [TowerTalk] SteppIR Redux (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 16:46:21 -0700
use, they collapse down to 3 feet (each side) or whatever. This would reduce the 2 be a big advantage for restricted QTH's. Here's an even better idea for a low-profile antenna. Figure out how to dr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00123.html (8,362 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR Redux (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck Lewis" <clewis@knology.net>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 19:36:02 -0500
Rick Karlquist challenges: A Canadian Company named Spar Aerospace (which later built the 'Canadian Arm' for Shuttle) did just that years ago. It was called a "Stem" (Storable Tubular Extendable Memb
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00124.html (10,919 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] SteppIR Redux (score: 1)
Author: Jack <videorov@direcway.com>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 20:39:46 -0400
I want to see the elements spacing adjust along with the elements length. KZ4USA FREE Classifieds With Photo Gallery http://www.hamradioclassifieds.com _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00125.html (7,757 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR Redux (score: 1)
Author: "on4kj" <on4kj@skynet.be>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 13:13:38 +0200
All, Thanks for the prompt reply. An other good day, I learned something. Jos on4kj _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wirel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00133.html (8,346 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR Redux (score: 1)
Author: Rob Frohne <frohro@wwc.edu>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 07:57:01 -0700
On May 6, 2004, at 4:38 PM, Joe Subich, K4IK wrote: Figure out how to make the elements of retractable tubing, so when not in use, they collapse down to 3 feet (each side) or whatever. This would red
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00135.html (9,859 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu